Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30% Poor	Memory 43.1 1-Core 35.5 2-Core 76.9 31% 51.8 Pts	4-Core 97.4 8-Core 106 13% 102 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.6% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.62 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.6% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 131 102 185 214 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.7% Below average	Read 182 Write 193 Mixed 74 SusWrite 162 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 12.8 46% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 45.1 DQ Mixed 80.3 63% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16