PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z420 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1589 |
Memory | 1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140325 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 18 '19 at 15:32 |
Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
Run User | SYC-User |
Background CPU | 54% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
60.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
273GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 91 91 91 MB/s
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 54 47 50 44 MB/s
|
20.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,499x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 772x |
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 686x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 495x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 304x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 261x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |