Asrock H110M-HDS

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160125
Uptime	49.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '19 at 11:40
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$40 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 175 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 256 30% 233 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 39.2 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 37.5 32% 35.8 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 36.9 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 374 415 439 443 407 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 411 Mixed 408 SusWrite 403 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 48.1 154% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 240 198% 287 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 125%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 169 174 178 169 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 180 Mixed 59 SusWrite 173 108% 149 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 499% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FBD 2x8GB 3,152 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.4% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 19 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 15.7 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	124x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	102x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	19x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	19x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	25x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16