Zoostorm 9876-2665A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZoostorm 9876-2665A  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte F2A78M-DS2
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 11:18
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 90.3
45% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 89.3
8-Core 89.9
12% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 86.4
5% 86.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.28
4% 4.36 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 122 126 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 152
Write 123
Mixed 132
SusWrite 124
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 21.3
95% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 114
89% 121 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback