| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130823 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 18 '19 at 08:51 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
73.2%
Very good
|
78% 135 Pts
|
44% 330 Pts
|
23% 373 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
36.6%
Below average
|
36% 45.8 fps
|
38% 47.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 427 437 417 412 408 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
94% 419 MB/s
|
157% 57.7 MB/s
|
259% 343 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
59.3%
Above average
|
59% 20.7 GB/s
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
61% 65.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,096 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 1,181x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 499x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 488x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 565x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 477x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 411x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $287 |