HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 08:28
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-2500-$134
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56% Above average
1-Core 93
2-Core 182
65% 138 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 353
48% 352 Pts
64-Core 355
24% 355 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$172
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Lighting 208
Reflection 181
Parallax 276
72% 222 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 209
Splatting 132
71% 164 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$110
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 208 220 219 231 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.8% Good
Read 252
Write 180
Mixed 151
SusWrite 214
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 28
103% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 106
100% 156 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$17
13GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 74 92 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 79
Write 76.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 95.8
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 60%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$32
26GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 58 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 49
Write 56.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 55.5
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown AXIOM MEMORY Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 5,233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback