HP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805D
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 04:09
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 422
56% 420 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 17
Parallax 20.2
19% 20.1 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 190 139 139 138 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 406
Mixed 352
SusWrite 166
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 49.6
168% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 304
231% 313 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 115%
Toshiba MK5055GS 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 74 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 75.5
Write 70.9
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 73.9
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 41%
Lacie Rikiki USB 3.0 1TB
232GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 86 86 86 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 56.3
Mixed 56
SusWrite 83.4
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 139 144 141 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 145
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 141
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 85%
I-O DATA HDPS-U 320GB
242GB free, PID 0122
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 38 36 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 34.4
Write 30.2
Mixed 27
SusWrite 36.5
43% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
133GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 51 55 50 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 68.4
Write 70.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 53.9
74% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 1,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $95
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback