PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 9020 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 9020 (all builds) |
Memory | 14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20181024 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 17 '19 at 19:24 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 78 49 65 105 107 MB/s
|
52.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 145 146 145 148 MB/s
|
85.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 3,459x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 2,217x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 1,850x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 3,548x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 708x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 682x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $178 |