Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime323 Days
Run DateJan 17 '19 at 17:29
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 95.5
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 185
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 344
43% 328 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 55.9
36% 33.5 fps
MRender 30.6
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 39.5
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 44 54 44 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 304
Write 135
Mixed 176
SusWrite 46.1
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 12.3
66% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 14.9
14% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 62%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
93GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 308 306 310 310 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62% Good
Read 426
Write 287
Mixed 227
SusWrite 310
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 19.5
80% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 25.1
24% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
109GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 46 61 47 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 117
Write 130
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 52
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 77%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 16GB-$29
12GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 25 18 25 17 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 28.4
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 18.4
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
35% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback