Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3632QM 24,912 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 156 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 302 38% 290 Pts	64-Core 300 18% 300 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0572) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.81% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 2.88 3% 4.16 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 7.96 5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.81% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 758GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 482 472 470 484 483 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WDC WD10 JPVT-75A1YT0 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 732GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 41 41 41 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.7% Very poor	Read 38.7 Write 39.5 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 40.2 50% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 11,714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.1 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	442x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 6%, 367 samples	18x
Radeon HD 7730MAMDBench 4%, 191 samples	8x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	64x
SH564128FH8NZQNSCG 2x4GBSmartBench 50%, 805 samples	41x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	33x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16