Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 54.7 1-Core 27.2 2-Core 54.7 31% 45.5 Pts	4-Core 68.7 8-Core 70.7 9% 69.7 Pts	64-Core 72.7 4% 72.7 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 146D) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.94% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.19 Parallax 0.94 1% 1.04 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.94% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK11B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 66 56 54 61 61 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38% Below average	Read 216 Write 193 Mixed 182 SusWrite 80.9 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 15.5 60% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 112 92% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.1 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4350ATIBench 1%, 1,871 samples	47x
Mobility Radeon HD 530vATIBench 1%, 250 samples	5x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16