Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130T-$60 5,264 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 80 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 112 56% 88.4 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 208 26% 200 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 309E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 4.5 3% 4.42 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.7 4% 4.96 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB 13,649 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RA SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 93 83 102 82 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 411 Write 367 Mixed 336 SusWrite 122 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 33.9 106% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 118 119% 193 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 89%
JetFlash Transcend 2GB 787 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.3 5.5 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	5.46% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 3.7 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 5.4 9% 8.55 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.46% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB 40,451 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 8.6 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16