Asus P5K SE

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5K SE (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '19 at 09:06
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8200-$12 4,318 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 38.4 2-Core 77 41% 62.3 Pts	4-Core 73.5 8-Core 77.4 10% 75.4 Pts	64-Core 74.7 5% 74.7 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 852D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.45 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.76 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 480GB 1,234 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 52GB free Firmware: SBFM10.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 122 124 108 23 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.2% Good	Read 257 Write 248 Mixed 217 SusWrite 102 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 30.7 113% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 155 129% 184 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 130%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 171 174 183 218 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68% Good	Read 259 Write 249 Mixed 232 SusWrite 180 52% 230 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 36.3 122% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 198 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 23GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 88 89 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 67.2 Write 68.3 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 86.9 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 40GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 153 140 144 142 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 141 Write 152 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 143 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA380 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 11GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 30 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.7% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 34.3 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 30 43% 31.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 18%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 24GB free, PID 5000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 25.7 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 25.7 36% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 64% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K SE Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K SE

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	37x
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	17x
Core2 Duo E8200Intel $12Bench 40%, 4,318 samples	13x

GPU
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	9x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	8x

SSD
MKNSSDTR250GB-3DL 250GBMushkinBench 58%, 114 samples	7x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	84x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	21x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16