Asrock Z77 Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121002
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '19 at 05:05
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 88.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 250 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 634 69% 546 Pts	64-Core 634 39% 634 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B E206) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 2 2% 2.29 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2.22 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 219 209 222 216 221 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 400 Write 240 Mixed 294 SusWrite 215 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 46.7 183% 68.4 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 258 190% 251 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB 3,261 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: MX4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 191 187 192 192 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 202 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 190 110% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB 2,942 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme9

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	25x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	17x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $46Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GBUnknownBench 45%, 8 samples	6x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $500

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16