PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AE8h |
Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160224 |
Uptime | 4.3 Days |
Run Date | Jan 16 '19 at 20:57 |
Run Duration | 200 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
71.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
16.2%
Very poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 137 136 136 137 137 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
|||
Intenso Sata III 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: O0617A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 121 121 122 123 123 MB/s
|
21.8%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
226GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 133 132 133 134 134 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
308GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 103 101 103 104 103 MB/s
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
233GB free
Firmware: JP1OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 110 109 111 110 111 MB/s
|
69.6%
Good
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB
363GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 297x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 272x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 252x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 143x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 130x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 123x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 97x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 52x |
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |