Asus P9D-C Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus P9D-C Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P9D-C Series
Memory	0.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160118
Uptime	8.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '19 at 07:16
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 99 2-Core 207 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 550 57% 458 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 165GB free Firmware: 02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 126 24 160 27 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 211 Write 434 Mixed 290 SusWrite 144 61% 270 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 95.4 4K Mixed 28.9 103% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 96.4 103% 171 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 111%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 150GB free Firmware: 02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 387 396 416 424 407 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 432 Write 452 Mixed 320 SusWrite 407 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 40.1 153% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 176 175% 281 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 111%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 547GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 86 101 145 143 143 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 20.3 Write 85 Mixed 38 SusWrite 116 47% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 984GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 143 141 145 148 144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 27.5 Write 141 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 143 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 206GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 131 141 158 131 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 148 Write 130 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 133 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.4 130% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 571GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 137 147 148 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 119 Write 114 Mixed 111 SusWrite 141 90% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 174% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 906GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 110 138 109 76 94 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 116 Write 128 Mixed 90 SusWrite 108 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-144.A00LF 4x8GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.1 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 18.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9D-C Series Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Asus P9D-C Series

CPU
Xeon E3-1231 v3Intel $209Bench 73%, 19,313 samples	4x
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $104Bench 69%, 5,273 samples	2x
Xeon E3-1240 v3Intel $203Bench 72%, 3,014 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
SSD370 128GBTranscend $74Bench 71%, 4,687 samples	1x

RAM
9965525-026.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 49%, 115 samples	3x
9965525-138.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 230 samples	1x
9965525-116.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 59%, 86 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16