Alienware Area-51 R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive385% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Area-51 R5  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0N4R4N
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 05:38
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$1,511
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1,056
96% 808 Pts
64-Core 3,049
189% 3,049 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Dell(1028 3718) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 221
Parallax 225
157% 213 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 206
Splatting 137
157% 200 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 146%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpe21d280gad NVME INTEL 280GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E201D02N Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1771 1712 1717 1677 1675 1681 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
385% Outstanding
Read 1,920
Write 1,735
Mixed 1,794
SusWrite 1,706
403% 1,789 MB/s
4K Read 162
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 146
509% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,119
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1,080
804% 1,065 MB/s
Poor: 310%
This bench: 385%
Great: 419%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140
158GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 168 158 165 168 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 362
Write 223
Mixed 241
SusWrite 167
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 36
124% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 209
167% 237 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
55GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 381 221 213 206 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 454
Mixed 400
SusWrite 279
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 51.3
180% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 198 198 197 197 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 187
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 197
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 159 158 158 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 164
Mixed 106
SusWrite 158
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 34.5
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 9.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Area-51 R5 Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Alienware Area-51 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $734
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback