Asus P5KPL/EPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL/EPU  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 03:10
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.8% Average
SC Int 88.3
SC Float 51.4
SC Mixed 64.9
55% 68.2 Pts
QC Int 346
QC Float 204
QC Mixed 257
61% 269 Pts
MC Int 348
MC Float 194
MC Mixed 257
40% 266 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 47.6
11% 37.8 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 37.5
12% 30.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 15%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$63
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 98 108 116 107 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 86.6
Write 70.2
Mixed 20
SusWrite 104
51% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$63
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 103 109 117 109 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 182
Write 86.1
Mixed 30
SusWrite 107
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 110%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
1TB free, PID 01ea
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Read 34.8
Write 28.6
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 6.1
27% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 20%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 26
Write 26.8
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 6.1
29% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 58%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.2 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 27.8
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 6.2
29% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 58%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
2TB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 28
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 6.1
30% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
810GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 34
Write 28.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 6.2
31% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 20%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1TB free, PID 3321
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 34
Write 28.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 6.1
30% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate Desktop 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 28.3
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 6.1
29% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 5.2
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P5KPL/EPU Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL/EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $145
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $314Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $145Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $651SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $73Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback