Asus P9D-C Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus P9D-C Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P9D-C Series
Memory	0.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160118
Uptime	14 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '19 at 02:02
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$65 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 104 2-Core 205 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 558 60% 474 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 480GB-$198 165 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 214GB free Firmware: 02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 471 456 465 469 474 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 465 Write 467 Mixed 326 SusWrite 466 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 40.6 158% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 170 172% 276 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 97%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 150GB free Firmware: 02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 195 51 74 179 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 216 Write 326 Mixed 217 SusWrite 152 52% 228 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 37.6 110% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 117 122% 200 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 111%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 118GB free Firmware: 02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 448 248 65 70 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 168 Write 434 Mixed 190 SusWrite 223 58% 253 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 97.8 4K Mixed 40.2 120% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 127 108% 155 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 111%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 77GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 159 158 159 164 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 25.8 Write 148 Mixed 49 SusWrite 159 70% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 774GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 160 160 161 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 163 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 161 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.9 203% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 97GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 107 107 103 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 62 Write 136 Mixed 93 SusWrite 106 74% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 813GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 99 112 110 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 142 Write 145 Mixed 110 SusWrite 99.6 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF 4x8GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.2% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 0.4 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9D-C Series Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Asus P9D-C Series

CPU
Xeon E3-1231 v3Intel $65Bench 73%, 19,313 samples	4x
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $150Bench 69%, 5,273 samples	2x
Xeon E3-1240 v3Intel $203Bench 72%, 3,014 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
SSD370 128GBTranscend $74Bench 71%, 4,687 samples	1x

RAM
9965525-026.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 49%, 115 samples	3x
9965525-138.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 230 samples	1x
9965525-116.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 59%, 86 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $124

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16