Biostar GF8100 M2G+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar GF8100 M2G+ (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '19 at 18:28
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X3 435 21 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 58.1 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 78.7 37% 58.8 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 116 16% 116 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.62% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 6.65 Parallax 5.03 5% 5.86 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 4.23 Splatting 5.52 4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.62% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 112 Write 87.6 Mixed 94.6 22% 98 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 27.5 89% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 53.9 DQ Mixed 41 32% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 396GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 97.1 Write 71.5 Mixed 27.5 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 309GB free Firmware: CC38 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 734 Write 22.5 Mixed 39.5 191% 265 MB/s	4K Read 187 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.5 7,984% 63.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 365GB free Firmware: 3.AF SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 46 Write 25.2 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 12.3 20% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB 10,673 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 110GB free Firmware: MS1O SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 74.1 Write 23.8 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 13.8 24% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 9 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GF8100 M2G+ Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar GF8100 M2G+

CPU
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	1x

GPU
RX 6500-XTAMD $140Bench 50%, 2,413 samples	1x

SSD
WDS5 00G2B0A 500GBWDCBench 82%, 267 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $140

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16