Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9600 323 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 23.5 2-Core 39.2 31% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 43.8 8-Core 41.5 6% 42.7 Pts	64-Core 44.9 3% 44.9 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 0252) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.26% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.27 Parallax 0.31 0% 0.31 fps	MRender 0.24 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.31 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.26% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC380S3120G 120GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 524ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 79 74 71 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 170 Write 138 Mixed 146 SusWrite 77.6 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 13.9 64% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 68.4 53% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 66%
Msft Virtual Disk 1GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 167 Write 63 Mixed 140 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 15.1 50% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 99 DQ Write 89.2 DQ Mixed 93.9 70% 94 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 1024, 4096 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16