Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 13:32
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 221
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 639
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 116
Parallax 95.9
90% 107 fps
MRender 93.2
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 101
80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 254 104 128 122 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 452
Mixed 373
SusWrite 190
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 52.1
170% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 348
261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 134%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
32GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 68 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 77.8
Write 61.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 70
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
49GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 117 121 119 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 73
Write 81.5
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 120
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $664
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback