Toshiba Satellite C55-B

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-B (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA ZBWAA
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '19 at 05:08
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2830 10,608 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	31.8% Below average	Memory 56.2 1-Core 22.7 2-Core 44.1 29% 41 Pts	4-Core 45.6 8-Core 44.3 6% 44.9 Pts	64-Core 45 3% 45 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 F910) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.92 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 145 111 94 88 84 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.4% Poor	Read 15.2 Write 206 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 115 23% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 6 58% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 80 72% 109 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB 44,908 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 6.5 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-B Builds (Compare 385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-B

CPU
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	97x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	96x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	53x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	198x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	154x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	20x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	99x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	47x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16