Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte AX370M-DS3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '19 at 19:58
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 80.4 1-Core 125 2-Core 249 84% 152 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 832 79% 656 Pts	64-Core 1,337 83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.5% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 136 Parallax 115 100% 124 fps	MRender 94.3 Gravity 119 Splatting 98.9 85% 104 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 30 90 60 100 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 447 Write 313 Mixed 318 SusWrite 110 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 18 78% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 81.3 DQ Mixed 13 33% 70 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 208 209 210 208 211 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 210 Write 146 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 209 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB 25,824 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 28.4 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 30.7 SC Mixed 24.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	189x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	147x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	101x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	201x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	107x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	77x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x

RAM
DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 83%, 9,905 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	22x
CL17-17-17 D4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 74%, 4,641 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16