| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131127 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 14 '19 at 12:23 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.3%
Above average
|
48% 73.7 Pts
|
18% 136 Pts
|
8% 138 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 240
PwrHis(1787 2012) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.3
|
6.16%
Terrible
|
6% 8.53 fps
|
6% 7.75 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team T253L3120G 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 84 86 53 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
25% 113 MB/s
|
56% 17.8 MB/s
|
24% 34.7 MB/s
|
|
|
53.6%
Above average
|
66% 89.2 MB/s
|
209% 1.6 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
435GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 125 126 126 126 MB/s
|
71.2%
Very good
|
78% 107 MB/s
|
161% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.7%
Below average
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
22% 7.7 GB/s
|
49% 81.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LE Builds (Compare 109 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 18x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 12x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $139 |