Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150430
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 04:01
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$157
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.8% Above average
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 165
59% 124 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 264
38% 275 Pts
64-Core 261
18% 261 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 64.1
18% 58.4 fps
MRender 52.3
Gravity 68
Splatting 36.7
19% 52.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 21%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 15 24 31 21 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.8% Very poor
Read 180
Write 49.8
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 24.4
16% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 6.4
27% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 13.1
DQ Mixed 8.3
9% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 83%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$70
94GB free
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 88 91 89 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 273
Write 118
Mixed 142
SusWrite 90.3
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 33.7
121% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 33.3
34% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 74%
WD Re 2TB-$40
921GB free
Firmware: 00.0NS04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 123 121 124 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 122
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 124
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
233% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 17.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.8
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 922 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $379
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback