PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P67X-UD3-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120321 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '19 at 01:25 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
|
65.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 148 105 66 61 59 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
315GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 68 84 80 75 58 MB/s
|
50%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer 32GB
23GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 11 9 8.6 9 9.4 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 29 29 28 29 MB/s
|
21.6%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 42x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 33x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 21x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 13x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $403 |