Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 47.9 2-Core 132 54% 87.8 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 333 33% 269 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.78 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 14 Parallax 10.9 12% 13.2 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 13.4 Splatting 15.6 11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 313 327 329 333 333 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 346 Write 345 Mixed 306 SusWrite 321 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 29.9 97% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 34.5 DQ Write 84 DQ Mixed 47.7 40% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 129%
Seagate NAS HDD 3TB-$119 3,343 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 171 170 170 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 169 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 170 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	42.3% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11.9 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16