Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180917
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '19 at 23:40
Run Duration	276 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 73.3 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 910 80% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,852 115% 1,852 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3717) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 148 Parallax 140 114% 143 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 137 Splatting 110 98% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 727GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 749 1024 1149 1185 1150 1176 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 2,066 Write 1,799 Mixed 719 SusWrite 1,072 315% 1,414 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 55.7 210% 80.2 MB/s	DQ Read 760 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 404 334% 491 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 302%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 893GB free Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 404 455 461 394 233 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 443 Mixed 310 SusWrite 376 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 78.4 4K Mixed 39.1 140% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 205 187% 287 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%
WD WD1501FASS-00U0B 1.5TB 1,224 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.00101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 133 134 135 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 141 Write 126 Mixed 98 SusWrite 134 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 82%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 134 136 134 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 155 Write 132 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 133 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 660GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 90 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 83.8 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 89.1 62% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 65%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1.5TB 770 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 899GB free, PID 5071 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 38 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 38.9 44% 32.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 18%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB 1,261 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID 6125 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 37.8 Write 38 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 38.9 50% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 2,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 113GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 158 Write 74.5 Mixed 77.7 116% 103 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 3.1 190% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB 1,517 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	182% Outstanding	MC Read 73.8 MC Write 73.4 MC Mixed 71.5 208% 72.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 42.3 SC Mixed 28 85% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 94 43% 94 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16