Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9220e RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 57.9 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 63.5 36% 54.7 Pts	4-Core 58.5 8-Core 64.2 8% 61.3 Pts	64-Core 63 4% 63 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 087E) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.31% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 5 Parallax 3.66 2% 3.71 fps	MRender 3.62 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 4.17 3% 3.46 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.31% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell WR202KD032G E70290F5 31GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 90014a SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 78 53 62 57 54 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 60%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 117GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 41 44 45 43 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 239 Write 58.4 Mixed 96.1 SusWrite 44.4 119% 110 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 7.8 708% 9.97 MB/s	DQ Read 13 DQ Write 14.5 DQ Mixed 8.4 827% 12 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KMKYF9-MID 1x8GB 525 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.1% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 8 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.8 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 27%, 1,578 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	3x

SSD
SL500 240GBColorfulBench 69%, 1,190 samples	1x
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	1x

RAM
ID:0xEF04 TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 1x8GBUnknownBench 20%, 13 samples	1x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	1x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16