EVGA 132-BL-E758

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	EVGA 132-BL-E758 (all builds)
Memory	20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '19 at 08:24
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 965-$1,244 1,602 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 97.1 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 159 69% 112 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 425 46% 366 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81% Excellent	Lighting 99.6 Reflection 110 Parallax 104 81% 105 fps	MRender 97.4 Gravity 96.3 Splatting 100 81% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 761GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 69 71 71 69 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.8% Average	Read 219 Write 199 Mixed 196 SusWrite 68.2 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 34.6 110% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 34.3 DQ Write 68.5 DQ Mixed 44.7 36% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 51GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 216 220 214 214 212 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.5% Above average	Read 217 Write 201 Mixed 195 SusWrite 214 47% 207 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 35.1 113% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 34.3 DQ Write 65.2 DQ Mixed 43.7 35% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 298GB free Firmware: V54OA52A SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 71 71 71 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 68.3 Write 68.5 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 70 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.8% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 22.3 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 15.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 49.8 80% 49.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 132-BL-E758 Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 132-BL-E758

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	69x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	13x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x
GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)NvidiaBench 40%, 5,438 samples	7x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	7x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	43x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	20x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $399

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16