PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H310M-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180507 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 13 '19 at 01:57 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-8400-$140
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
20%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 206 210 205 202 203 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
122GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 95 95 93 94 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
842GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 113 113 109 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 315x |
Core i5-8400Intel $140Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 314x |
Core i7-8700Intel $193Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 191x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 174x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 117x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 100x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $257 |