Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 22:19
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 907
80% 680 Pts
64-Core 2,461
152% 2,461 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 213
Parallax 238
131% 204 fps
MRender 259
Gravity 222
Splatting 150
165% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 134%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
623GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1706 1623 1572 1560 1513 1848 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,648
Write 1,293
Mixed 898
SusWrite 1637
307% 1,369 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 63.7
213% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 865
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 788
597% 803 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 268%
Great: 354%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
140GB free
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1866 1397 1394 1393 1396 1395 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1849
Write 2,070
Mixed 1,719
SusWrite 1,473
401% 1778 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 63.6
218% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 915
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 869
630% 820 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 267%
Great: 335%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
364GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 191 169 167 159 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 128
Write 138
Mixed 40
SusWrite 174
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 107%
HFS256G32TND-N210A 256GB
99GB free
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 194 188 198 183 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 121%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 34.5
Write 35.2
Mixed 27
SusWrite 35.6
45% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
15GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
9.93% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 16.5
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 3.9
17% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.4
153% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
176% Outstanding
MC Read 72
MC Write 69.4
MC Mixed 70.8
202% 70.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 28.4
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 176%
Great: 175%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,044
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback