Hp-pavilion WC784AA-UUW p6345sc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	8.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion WC784AA-UUW p6345sc (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Eureka3
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091113
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 21:16
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Memory 57 1-Core 34.6 2-Core 70.9 35% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 69.8 8-Core 69.4 9% 69.6 Pts	64-Core 69.9 4% 69.9 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PwrHis(1787 2334) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	8.32% Terrible	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 11.3 Parallax 13.9 9% 11.9 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 9.78 8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.32% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 719GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 88 115 124 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 134 Write 110 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 100 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 109%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 1,213 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.23% Terrible	Read 14.7 Write 5.5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 5.6 8% 6.88 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.23% Great: 10%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 12 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 23.9 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 14 29% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 72% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 38%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 414GB free, PID 102a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 15 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 29 Write 16.1 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 14.4 27% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WC784AA-UUW p6345sc Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion WC784AA-UUW p6345sc

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	1x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

RAM
10GBUnknownBench 31%, 21,027 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion WC784AA-UUW p6345sc

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Hp-pavilion WC784AA-UUW p6345sc

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)