| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 550P5C/550P7C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP550P5C-S05CL |
| Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20141024 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 12 '19 at 20:38 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | CHL-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.8%
Very good
|
69% 117 Pts
|
44% 352 Pts
|
27% 442 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.81
|
35.7%
Below average
|
38% 43.3 fps
|
31% 38.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
696GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 58 65 70 70 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
39% 52.6 MB/s
|
77% 0.47 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 7.2 7.1 7.6 6.8 7.8 MB/s
|
20.5%
Poor
|
29% 33.3 MB/s
|
96% 4.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
56.3%
Above average
|
56% 19.7 GB/s
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
58% 69.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 550P5C/550P7C Builds (Compare 598 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 550P5C/550P7C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 312x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 151x |
| Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples | 106x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 476x |
| GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples | 85x |
| GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $448 |