PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D-E PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120626 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 12 '19 at 17:41 |
Run Duration | 228 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 127 129 129 129 MB/s
|
55.6%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
342GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
462GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 86 87 86 MB/s
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
USB3.0 320GB
105GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
736GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 77 79 78 87 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
35GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8 9.6 10 11 11 MB/s
|
7.91%
Terrible
|
|||
Patriot Memory 127GB
94GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 21 20 20 21 MB/s
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB
124GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
2TB free, PID 61b7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 76 78 79 79 79 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
|
46%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 79x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 76x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $426 |