Gigabyte GA-H110M-D3H R2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-D3H R2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-D3H R2-CF (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 17:00
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 125 2-Core 247 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 461 63% 469 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.3% Above average	Lighting 73.8 Reflection 77.7 Parallax 73.2 60% 74.9 fps	MRender 72.4 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 70.7 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 110GB free Firmware: 1AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 129 133 135 127 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 102 Write 30.5 Mixed 69 SusWrite 130 61% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 81%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 982GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 118 128 125 109 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 124 Write 113 Mixed 39 SusWrite 118 72% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 140% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB 5,399 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 11.2 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 12.3 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-D3H R2-CF Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-D3H R2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	5x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	4x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	5x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	4x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 41%, 2,391 samples	2x
9905678-024.A00G Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 8GBKingstonBench 66%, 20 samples	2x
M378A5143EB1-CPB Kingston 9905678-024.A00G 8GBSamsungBench 70%, 52 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $148

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16