Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 11:59
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-7400-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.7% Below average
SC Int 42.8
SC Float 42.3
SC Mixed 50.4
36% 45.2 Pts
QC Int 193
QC Float 195
QC Mixed 198
44% 195 Pts
MC Int 274
MC Float 333
MC Mixed 280
44% 296 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$123
Sapphire(174B 5454) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 98
Reflection 60.7
Parallax 93
30% 83.9 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 49
Splatting 27.7
18% 42.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 91 70 69 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.6% Poor
Read 218
Write 184
Mixed 158
SusWrite 81.8
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 5.9
24% 9.1 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 91.7
DQ Mixed 28.6
42% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 58%
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 66 61 64 75 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 202
Write 147
Mixed 161
SusWrite 90.9
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 10.7
42% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 157
139% 207 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.7% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 75%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $368Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $780SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback