Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160513
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 11:54
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 9,821 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 99.7 54% 83.4 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 207 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 366A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56% Above average	Lighting 70.9 Reflection 70.6 Parallax 62.8 58% 68.1 fps	MRender 72.8 Gravity 65.7 Splatting 57.3 53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Goodram CX100 120GB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 424 Write 350 Mixed 246 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 33.3 123% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 36.9 37% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 90%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 24GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 14 11 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 56.2 Write 5 Mixed 8 SusWrite 11.3 15% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 46GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 73 75 75 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 78.7 Write 73.2 Mixed 78 SusWrite 74.1 57% 76 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 37,489 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.8% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 7.3 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 6.6 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	11x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	10x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	10x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	9x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	9x
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	4x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 3,851 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $385

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16