Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 145%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 11:46
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i9-7900X-$904
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
112% Outstanding
SC Int 133
SC Float 135
SC Mixed 133
107% 134 Pts
QC Int 487
QC Float 516
QC Mixed 501
114% 501 Pts
MC Int 1,499
MC Float 1,708
MC Mixed 1,653
242% 1,620 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 411.95
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 61.2
16% 48 fps
MRender 43.7
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 38.6
20% 45.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$149
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1779 1584 1600 1570 1519 1632 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 1916
Write 1,931
Mixed 1,094
SusWrite 1,614
368% 1,639 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61.5
186% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,322
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,206
904% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 288%
Great: 400%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 217 210 216 214 219 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 148
Mixed 65
SusWrite 218
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.5
208% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 112%
Great: 139%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$140
201GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 132
Write 104
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 105
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 99%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$59
227GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 57 57 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 53.4
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 55.9
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 56.7
MC Mixed 30.6
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 139%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 1,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $1,424
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $314Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $140Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $651SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $73Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback