MSI MS-7360

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	MSI MS-7360 (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 10:30
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6850-$57 4,150 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 75 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 67.4 40% 58.8 Pts	4-Core 66.5 8-Core 66.7 9% 66.6 Pts	64-Core 67.1 4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Gigabyte(1458 3515) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.3 Reflection 25.1 Parallax 19.3 17% 21.9 fps	MRender 28.7 Gravity 22.2 Splatting 23.5 20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 46 81 108 24 131 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.1% Below average	Read 201 Write 91.8 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 78.6 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 14.1 53% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 14.1 DQ Write 24.5 DQ Mixed 16.6 13% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 85%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 389GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 94.4 Write 84.7 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 89 61% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 54%
Seagate Expansion 500GB 5,329 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 57GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 26 26 26 26 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 24.1 Write 25.2 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 25.4 18% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.4 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7360 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7360

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	14x
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	8x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	5x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	4x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	3x

SSD
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples	5x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	4x
480GB 480GBSSDBench 65%, 2,159 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	34x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	16x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16