Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 09:40
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
SC Int 89.9
SC Float 105
SC Mixed 103
79% 99.3 Pts
QC Int 389
QC Float 419
QC Mixed 404
92% 404 Pts
MC Int 1,087
MC Float 1,145
MC Mixed 1,128
168% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$210
XFX(1682 3212) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 134
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 193
48% 135 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 138
Splatting 85.3
41% 94.3 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$45
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 111 107 130 130 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 156
Write 135
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 107
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
295GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 94 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 92
Mixed 55
SusWrite 94.7
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 72%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$115
285GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 113 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 142
Write 158
Mixed 55
SusWrite 112
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 111%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.9 7.3 7.3 7.9 6.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5% Terrible
Read 16
Write 9.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 7.3
11% 9.25 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$124
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 7,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 130%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 144% - Outstanding Total price: $892
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $159Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $124SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $800SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback