Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 06:42
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 102
50% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 274
29% 234 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 83.1
48% 66.9 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 75.5
52% 62.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 34 34 34 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63% Good
Read 337
Write 298
Mixed 273
SusWrite 32.9
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 43.1
142% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 42
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 54.7
46% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
114GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 60 59 59 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 71.2
Mixed 59
SusWrite 56.4
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
90GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 60 59 59 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 30.2
Write 33.5
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 56.4
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 42%
Toshiba MK3263GSX 320GB-$68
129GB free
Firmware: FG020M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 34 35 35 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 67.8
Write 64
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 34.1
39% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.7% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback