Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 00:46
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 94.4 1-Core 149 2-Core 298 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 593 8-Core 1,053 99% 823 Pts	64-Core 1,094 68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 44.4 39% 48.9 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 61.9 48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 446 459 472 445 464 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 478 Mixed 397 SusWrite 454 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 58.2 202% 74.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 357 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 131%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 407 368 271 248 270 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 88.8 Write 431 Mixed 375 SusWrite 322 70% 304 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 41.1 150% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 238 180% 236 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 382GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 446 458 470 442 458 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 442 Mixed 384 SusWrite 452 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 63.5 213% 76.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 355 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 3,140 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 37.6 MC Mixed 30.4 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 39.2 SC Mixed 26.1 81% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,317x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,137x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,085x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,046x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	812x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	685x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	510x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	508x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	466x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $796

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16