HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemHP Z220 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1790
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141021
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 00:36
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
68.8% Good
SC Int 93.1
SC Float 96
SC Mixed 93.9
76% 94.3 Pts
QC Int 360
QC Float 360
QC Mixed 359
82% 360 Pts
MC Int 351
MC Float 360
MC Mixed 357
53% 356 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Lighting 215
Reflection 160
Parallax 284
74% 220 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 194
Splatting 183
71% 169 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 960GB
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 536 466 482 480 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 604
Write 606
Mixed 411
SusWrite 478
118% 525 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 37.7
131% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 137
167% 285 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 110%
Great: 252%
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 64 61 61 67 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 163
Write 83.2
Mixed 105
SusWrite 63.9
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 24.2
88% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 87.7
69% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 51%
Patriot Blaze 240GB-$50
42GB free
Firmware: S8FM08.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 197 48 11 82 158 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.4% Average
Read 248
Write 236
Mixed 168
SusWrite 110
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 15.2
59% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 54.7
68% 120 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
129GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 166 160 162 163 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 145
Write 92.8
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 160
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$158
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 165 160 164 164 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 84.7
Write 118
Mixed 54
SusWrite 158
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70%
Great: 91%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
397GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 27 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 24
Mixed 23
SusWrite 26.2
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $534
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $380Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $119Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $88
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $716SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $120SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback