HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141021
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 00:28
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 174 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 310 42% 311 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Lighting 69.2 Reflection 59.4 Parallax 85.4 56% 71.4 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 62.6 Splatting 76.7 55% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 960GB 3,595 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 802GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 459 411 400 428 448 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 599 Write 588 Mixed 393 SusWrite 420 112% 500 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 32.7 109% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 403 DQ Mixed 137 157% 264 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 291%
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB 4,861 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 9GB free Firmware: 1.23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 72 68 75 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 183 Write 79.5 Mixed 103 SusWrite 72.2 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 24.7 93% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 81.3 DQ Mixed 89.8 71% 101 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 51%
Patriot Blaze 240GB-$50 1,382 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 42GB free Firmware: S8FM08.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 99 11 16 127 10 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.5% Below average	Read 243 Write 228 Mixed 168 SusWrite 70.8 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 15 58% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 56.8 69% 120 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 129GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 106 107 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 145 Write 113 Mixed 67 SusWrite 106 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 153 157 163 168 163 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 98.3 Write 98.3 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 158 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 90%
WD Elements 107C 4TB 3,603 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 397GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 26.2 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 26.2 36% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GB 1,512 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.1 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 15 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	616x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	72x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16