Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 50.3 1-Core 51.7 2-Core 96.7 39% 66.2 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 437 42% 348 Pts	64-Core 1,240 77% 1,240 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H330 Adp 511GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 448 448 443 448 440 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 002C00B3002C 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 002C0632002C 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 002C0632002C 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 00AD00B300AD HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 002C00B3002C 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 80GB 2133, 2133, 0, 0, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.7% Excellent	MC Read 41.6 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 33.1 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 15.5 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
Xeon E5-2630 v3IntelBench 69%, 1,838 samples	5x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	2x

SSD
Force LS 120GBCorsair $98Bench 54%, 9,315 samples	2x
hynix SC308 SATA 256GBSKBench 69%, 6,224 samples	2x
520 Series 120GBIntel $199Bench 74%, 19,348 samples	2x

RAM
18ASF2G72XF12G6V21 002C00B3002C 18ASF2G72XF12G6V21 00CE00B300CE M393A2K43BB1-CTD 002C00B3002C 18ASF2G72XF12G6V21 002C00B3002C 18ASF2G72XF12G6V21 002C00B3002C 18ASF2G72XF12G6V21 00AD00B300AD HMA82GR7AFR8N-VK 002C00B3002C 18ASF2G... 192GBUnknownBench 75%, 7 samples	2x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 4x16GBUnknownBench 69%, 38 samples	2x
HMA82GR7DJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 42%, 5 samples	2x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $438

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16