Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '19 at 22:36
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 86.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 239 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 487 8-Core 886 82% 687 Pts	64-Core 1,318 82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB CLim: 1204 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.4% Average	Lighting 60.8 Reflection 60.4 Parallax 78.3 50% 66.5 fps	MRender 72.6 Gravity 69.3 Splatting 45 49% 62.3 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 382GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 1158 618 623 620 623 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,350 Write 1,198 Mixed 1124 SusWrite 793 251% 1,116 MB/s	4K Read 60.3 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 77.1 254% 86.2 MB/s	DQ Read 998 DQ Write 896 DQ Mixed 950 712% 948 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 340%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 238GB free Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 464 465 466 465 468 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 464 Mixed 446 SusWrite 463 105% 468 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 43.8 140% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 357 267% 354 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 109%
WD Green 2.5TB (2011)-$80 1,241 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 100 103 101 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 112 Write 113 Mixed 102 SusWrite 100 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 788GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 82 83 83 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 96 Write 83.2 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 82.6 61% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KD48GU880-32A160X 2x8GB 1,112 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 35.7 MC Mixed 33.6 105% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 36.5 SC Mixed 28.3 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16