Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '19 at 20:36
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 195 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 366 48% 362 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: Press Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Lighting 61.3 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 77.5 50% 68 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 57 Splatting 54.3 48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 34 38 32 29 32 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 398 Mixed 278 SusWrite 64.9 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 53.7 191% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 169 180% 298 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 154GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 307 308 308 308 305 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 444 Mixed 381 SusWrite 313 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 63.7 202% 74.7 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 359 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x8GB 3,520 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.4% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 18.7 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 20.7 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 - $21

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	190x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	139x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	119x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	76x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	64x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	45x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16