Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
11 days ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K/BR  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 13:34
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Athlon 200GE-$56
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
SC Int 82.7
SC Float 91
SC Mixed 86.4
69% 86.7 Pts
QC Int 219
QC Float 253
QC Mixed 236
53% 236 Pts
MC Int 235
MC Float 249
MC Mixed 246
36% 243 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 64%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$45
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 187 162 183 160 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 156
Mixed 75
SusWrite 171
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME A320M-K/BR Builds (Compare 570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $380
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $159Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $89
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $780SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback